Approved site plan was wrongly approved and was having serious drawbacks as area chart of approved site plan shows porch area as 180 Sqft but in the drawing of approved site plan the area of porch has been mentioned as 17×18 (306 Sqft). Moreover, Porch, Verandah, drawing room as per approved drawing of site plan was shown in straight line which is rarely witnessed having verandah and porch open
Owner didn’t even construct the Porch and Verandah as was mentioned in approved site plan besides extending three ft gallery by terming it verandah on ground floor and infact constructed three big commercial halls all in equal size without maintaining setbacks from front and back side
When locals objected to commercial construction on residential plot , enforcement staff instead of taking action against owner befooled public that owner is raising residential construction and will do partition later besides they maintained that construction work has been stopped but that turned out mere eyewash as construction was never stopped and had the construction stopped owner would not have constructed three floors commercial structure
Moreover prime parameter of residential house is compound wall which is first of all constructed but the owner in the present case hasn’t constructed compound wall so far which itself is a testimony that construction is commercial which surprisingly JMC fails to see to take action against owner
GY CORRESPONDENT
jammu, jun 07
Jammu Municipal Corporation has failed to take decisive and timely action against violators both in Gandhi Nagar and Channi Himmat area as in most of the cases ,it has only helped and supported violators rather than performing their duty to implement Jammu Master Plan 2032. To put things in perspective one Ashok Kumar s/o late Omparkash r/o Gandhi Nagar Jammu purchased a old residential house measuring 2925 Sqft (45×65) a corner plot at 487-A in Ward-20 Gandhi Nagar Jammu from Pushpa Devi by paying worth crores with a aim to run business by raising commercial structure on residential plot. Accordingly the owner got approved site plan from JMC vide No. 827/JMC/BS/2021 dated 20-10-2021 with a condition that the owner will raise fresh residential construction by dismantling existing residential house. According to approved site plan, the owner was allowed ground floor including porch for parking 1901.25 Sqft first and 2nd floor 1901.25 Sqft,porch area 180 Sqft with open area 1023.75 Sqft. The owner was mandatory to observe setbacks including 10 ft from front side,sides Nil, rear 12 ft 9 inch. On the ground floor, the owner allowed Porch 17×18, verandah 13 ft 9 inchx 5 ft, Drawing room 12 ft 9 inch x10 ft, entrance lobby, living room 33.6×17.0,kichen/dining room19-0x15 and toilet 7×7 ft-6 inch, height of building fixed at 38.6 Sqft from front road level. It deserves mentioning here that this approved site plan was wrongly approved and was having serious drawbacks as area chart of approved site plan shows porch area as 180 Sqft but in the drawing of approved site plan the area of porch has been mentioned as 17×18 (306 Sqft). Moreover, Porch, Verandah, drawing room as per approved drawing of site plan was shown in straight line which is rarely witnessed having verandah and porch open.
However the owner against the approved site plan started commercial construction by covering area of verandah and covered porch area on RCC Pillars and fitted windows on front side where there was Porch without leaving any space for mandatory setbacks particularly from front side which was mandatory besides mandatory space was also not left from backside and kept entrance from backside also.Not only this owner didn’t even construct the Porch and Verandah as was mentioned in approved site plan besides extending three ft gallery by terming it verandah on ground floor and infact constructed three big commercial halls. The owner likewise constructed first and 2nd floor as big commercial halls all in equal size covering nearly 2300 Sqft. It deserves mentioning here that both J&K Housing Board and JMC have already served notice to owner for encroaching road area nearly 10 ft but the owner instead of removing encroachment merged this area under construction. However when locals objected to commercial construction on residential plot by getting residential site plan from JMC and brought the issue into kind notice of enforcement staff, they instead of taking action against owner befooled the public that the owner is raising residential construction and will do partition later besides they maintained that the construction work has been stopped but that turned out mere eyewash as the construction was never stopped as had the construction stopped the owner would not have constructed three floors commercial halls which is clearly a commercial structure. Moreover the prime parameter of residential house is compound wall which is first of all constructed but the owner in the present case hasn’t constructed compound wall which itself is a testimony that construction is commercial.
Till date no partition has been done at the site and as an eye wash endeavor, owner as per guidance of JMC has fitted an ordinary door to hoodwink general public as main entrance. However when JMC enforcement staff did not take any action against owner, a RTI application was filed to know the status of construction whether as per approved site plan or against it. Assistant Enforcement Officer, JMC Anil Kashyap in his reply said that owner has started partition work on ground floor vide No.JMC/CEO/1173-74 dated 2-3-2022 which was wrong as no such partition has been done as yet by owner besides there is no parking facility at the site ignoring porch parking. JMC further vide No.JMC/CEO/435-37 dated 25-6-2022 replied that JMC has served notice under 7(1) vide No.JMC/CEO/08/01/2022 dated 10-6-2022 which proved mere eyewash as construction continued. Now as a result of which three floor commercial halls construction is all set to be inaugurated any time soon but JMC enforcement staff particularly Enforcement Officer Anil Kashyap as how owner managed to construct three floor commercial construction on residential plot after getting residential site plan approved from JMC despite serving him BOCA notice to owner. This is matter of serious investigation to find out on whose command the owner was helped and supported by JMC enforcement staff against will of JMP-2032 and Unified Building Bye-laws 2021 and if no action is taken against owner, then locals will assume that whole of JMC is well behind owner to save his commercial construction on residential plot after approving his site plan purely as residential. It deserves mentioning here that as per Jammu Master Plan 2032 and Unified Building Byelaws 2021 porches up to an area of 17 Sqm shall be allowed in side setbacks only and no construction over such porches shall be allowed and area under porch shall be calculated @ 50% for coverage but the owner raised three floors of equal size more of a construction purely commercial in nature. This is a matter of serious investigation as how influential persons are being allowed to violative constructions and the rules and demolition drive is only meant for common man .In yet another open violation of rules and regulations, JMC even allowing construction of basements in Gandhi Nagar planned residential colony which is not at all permissible under JMP-2032.
Trending
- JMC immune to recruitments rules, No vacant post filled through proper channel as prevalent in J&KUT and now engages 4 skilled workers in JMC Town Planner Section from NGO M/S Sotra Enterprises without requisite qualification on terms and conditions already in vogue vide order No.JMC/Estt/5117-21 dated 29-8-2022 issued by then Commissioner JMC,Rahul Yadav as per Govt order No.384-GAD of 2015 dated 17-3-2015 all Administrative Secretaries and Managing Directors of all state owned Public Sector Undertakings (PSUs) were categorically asked not to engage even a single casual/seasonal/need based worker under any circumstances without the prior specific approval of Chief Secretary
- Nepotism and favoritism at its best in PHE Division Akhnoor in case of Kamini Kumar at present working Head Assistant at PHE Division Nowshera has wrongly drawn his salary/leave salary from 2011 to 2024 and has served in PHE Division Akhnoor w.e.f. 1988 to 2024 as daily wager, class ivth, Junior Assistant, Senior Assistant and not served anywhere except his present place of posting in Nowshera PHE Division despite his transfers with promotions
- JMC continues to act as mute spectator, violators raising choice construction with help of enforcement staff against JMP-2032, UBBL-2021, JMC Act 2000
- JMC fails to implement verdict of High Court Jammu dated 9-10-2024 in case of residential house 584/4, Ward-50 Channi Himmat by allowing owner to continue running big shop under name & Style Durga Dutt Mart after converting drawing room making land use change from residential to commercial when JMC was at liberty to proceed against owner in case he doesn’t restore back drawing room by closing shop on residential ground floor and use premises purely for residential purpose only and de-seals shop when owner doesn’t fulfills conditions of de-sealing order
- JMC fails to serve notices under JMC Act 2000 to owner of residential plot 629/3, Channi Himmat for raising three floors commercial structure without maintaining setbacks , changing both internal and external dimensions after getting residential site plan approved from JMC but not raising residential construction except keeping space for temporary windows and keeping two way entry completely deviating from approved site plan contrary to JMP-2032,UBBL-2021, JMC Act 2000
- Both JMC & J&K Housing Board act as mute spectator towards running of HIGH5 ARCADE+SOFTPLAY+CAFE at residential plot 649/3, Sector-3, Ward-50 Channi Himmat Colony after owner earlier raised commercial halls without internal partitions completely deviating from approved residential site plans both stage-1st and stage-2nd against JMP-2032,UBBL-2021 & JMC Act 2000 with JMC serving owner delayed notice without any follow-up and Housing Board completing formalities of dispatching letters to JMC seeking action against owner resulting in continuance of commercial activities from residential plot from last 8 months
- JMC’s BOCA notices and undertakings by owners fail to stop unauthorized constructions in absence of their implementation on ground as witnessed on residential plot 203/2 on main road side Channi Himmat Ward-50 where JMC after serving BOCA notice to owner didn’t take any action after owner submitted undertaking resulting in running of RK Fabrics earlier from shop of residential ground floor now from whole of ground floor residential making land use change and raising first floor without JMC permission without maintaining setbacks
- JMC fails to stop restarted unauthorized modern steel structure on existing violated three floor commercial structure from last one month at residential plot No. Extn 8/9 Sector-C Ward-69, Sainik Colony when validity of approved commercial site plans validity stands expired on 16-2-2023 and earlier dramatizing fake demolition drive on Feb 28, 2022 falsely claiming demolishing violated portion of floors, after serving eyewash notice to owner under section 7(1) of J&K BOCA Act 1988 dated 8-1-2022 but taking no follow-up action