Mighty religious organization under adamant bureaucracy denies gratuity to its daily wager and contractual employee
According to gratuity Act employer is punishable with imprisonment six months but which may extend to two years
The Ministry of Labour & Employment (MOLE) is among receiving highest number of grievances of employer’s harassment
Bureaucratic elites administration in Shrine Board maintain their authoritarian type control
When employees speak out against mal-administration, it becomes challenge to bureaucratic power and employee’s faces suspension and termination
GY CORRESPONDENT
katra, Oct 27
Despite of Notice served upon through Station House Officer, Katra directing the Chief Executive Officer, Shrine Mata Vaishno Devi Shrine Board to personally appear before the hon’ble before the Court of Asstt. Collector, Katra on 27-10-2023 in the case titled Gulab Ram S/o Sh. Balak Ram C/o BMS, Prade, Jammu versus Chief Executive Officer, Shri Mata Vaishno Devi Shrine Board, Katra District Reasi mentioning “Whereas the above titled case has been fixed for hearing on 27/10/2023 in this court. It is to inform you to pay amount as arrears of land revenue provided under section 8 of the payment of Gratuity Act to the tune of Rupees 6,18,513 (Rupees Six Lakh Eighteen Thousand Five Hundred Thirteen Only) or deposit the same amount in this court on or before the next date of hearing on i.e 27/10/2022. Being deprived of the right to get gratuity from the Shrine Board’s employees along with the labor union had filed a case in the Labour Court Reasi, the said case was in favor of the employees. The CEO of the Board repeatedly served Notices from the Honble Court of Assistant Collector, Katra to pay the dues of gratuity to the aggrieved employees, but the authority of the Shrine Board has become so callous and heartless that it is not paying the hard-earned money of poor class VI workers.
As per the Section: 4 Payment of gratuity. (1) Gratuity shall be payable to an employee on the termination of his employment after he has rendered continuous service for not less than five years, – (a) on his superannuation, or (b) on his retirement or resignation, or (c) on his death or disablement due to accident or disease: Provided that the completion of continuous service of five years shall not be necessary where the termination of the employment of any employee is due to death or disablement:
Whereas Section: 9 Penalties. (1) Whoever, for the purpose of avoiding any payment to be made by himself under this Act or of enabling any other person to avoid such payment, knowingly makes or causes to be made any false statement or false representation shall be punishable with imprisonment for a term which may extend to six months, or with fine which may extend to ten thousand rupees or with both. (2) An employer who contravenes, or makes default in complying with, any of the provisions of this Act or any rule or order made there under shall be punishable with imprisonment for a term which shall not be less than three months but which may extend to one year, or with fine which shall not be less than ten thousand rupees but which may extend to twenty thousand rupees, or with both: Provided that where the offence relates to non-payment of any gratuity payable under this Act, the employer shall be punishable with imprisonment for a term which shall not be less than [36] [Six months but which may extend to two years] unless the court trying the offence, for reasons to be recorded by it in writing, is of opinion that a lesser term of imprisonment or the imposition 01; a fine would meet the ends of justice.In Shrine Board only state sponsored bureaucrat rules like authoritarians. There is little free speech for employees against dictatorship style. Employees who demand fundamental rights from these bureaucrats are likely to be harassed, demoted or dismissed. There is no independent judiciary to deal with grievances of the employees of the Shri Mata Vaishno Devi Shrine Board.
Trending
- JSCL deliberately didn’t advertise e-Nit No. JSCL 171/01 of 2024-25 dated 30-01-2025 worth Rs 7293728.36 in print/electronic media to accommodate blue eyed firms for engagement of concessionaire to manage advertisements on static Ad Panels installed by Jammu Smart City Ltd for a period of five years ignoring Govt Circular No. 22-JK(GAD) of 2023 dated 1-8-2023 resulting only two incompetent firms participated in bidding resulting in loss to exchequer
- JMC immune to recruitments rules, No vacant post filled through proper channel as prevalent in J&KUT and now engages 4 skilled workers in JMC Town Planner Section from NGO M/S Sotra Enterprises without requisite qualification on terms and conditions already in vogue vide order No.JMC/Estt/5117-21 dated 29-8-2022 issued by then Commissioner JMC,Rahul Yadav as per Govt order No.384-GAD of 2015 dated 17-3-2015 all Administrative Secretaries and Managing Directors of all state owned Public Sector Undertakings (PSUs) were categorically asked not to engage even a single casual/seasonal/need based worker under any circumstances without the prior specific approval of Chief Secretary
- Nepotism and favoritism at its best in PHE Division Akhnoor in case of Kamini Kumar at present working Head Assistant at PHE Division Nowshera has wrongly drawn his salary/leave salary from 2011 to 2024 and has served in PHE Division Akhnoor w.e.f. 1988 to 2024 as daily wager, class ivth, Junior Assistant, Senior Assistant and not served anywhere except his present place of posting in Nowshera PHE Division despite his transfers with promotions
- JMC continues to act as mute spectator, violators raising choice construction with help of enforcement staff against JMP-2032, UBBL-2021, JMC Act 2000
- JMC fails to implement verdict of High Court Jammu dated 9-10-2024 in case of residential house 584/4, Ward-50 Channi Himmat by allowing owner to continue running big shop under name & Style Durga Dutt Mart after converting drawing room making land use change from residential to commercial when JMC was at liberty to proceed against owner in case he doesn’t restore back drawing room by closing shop on residential ground floor and use premises purely for residential purpose only and de-seals shop when owner doesn’t fulfills conditions of de-sealing order
- JMC fails to serve notices under JMC Act 2000 to owner of residential plot 629/3, Channi Himmat for raising three floors commercial structure without maintaining setbacks , changing both internal and external dimensions after getting residential site plan approved from JMC but not raising residential construction except keeping space for temporary windows and keeping two way entry completely deviating from approved site plan contrary to JMP-2032,UBBL-2021, JMC Act 2000
- Both JMC & J&K Housing Board act as mute spectator towards running of HIGH5 ARCADE+SOFTPLAY+CAFE at residential plot 649/3, Sector-3, Ward-50 Channi Himmat Colony after owner earlier raised commercial halls without internal partitions completely deviating from approved residential site plans both stage-1st and stage-2nd against JMP-2032,UBBL-2021 & JMC Act 2000 with JMC serving owner delayed notice without any follow-up and Housing Board completing formalities of dispatching letters to JMC seeking action against owner resulting in continuance of commercial activities from residential plot from last 8 months
- JMC’s BOCA notices and undertakings by owners fail to stop unauthorized constructions in absence of their implementation on ground as witnessed on residential plot 203/2 on main road side Channi Himmat Ward-50 where JMC after serving BOCA notice to owner didn’t take any action after owner submitted undertaking resulting in running of RK Fabrics earlier from shop of residential ground floor now from whole of ground floor residential making land use change and raising first floor without JMC permission without maintaining setbacks