Owner against approved site plan constructed basement 1200 sqft and two shops on it instead of Stilt parking, Ist floor 1440 sqft and also not maintain setbacks Rear 26 ft. Side-1, 12 ft and shape of plot also changed at site as it was not as per approved drawing, constructed basement by covering hundred percent area without observing setbacks
Owner being a retiree as Superintending Engineer managed a report from private Geo-Globe Consultants Soil and Material Testing Laboratory dated 5-5-2019 that whatever minor deviations has been done on the guidance of structural Engineer citing loose soil of plot which were simple ploys to save unauthorized construction in the name of danger to building during earthquake whereas nothing of that sort has been found in nearby constructions raised strictly as per approved site plan
Owner made an appeal to High Court to withdraw appeal but Court didn’t let owner to withdraw appeal. However with a view to get a clearer picture on this aspect, Hon’ble Divisional Bench appointed Court Commissioner to submit detailed and comprehensive report extent of violations committed in regard to building permissions granted
JMC didn’t appeal against Tribunal order of compounding violations beyond 10% before High Court Jammu which makes stand of JMC in this particular case highly ambiguous as on one hand application for depositing compounding fee was not approved by Commissioner JMC and on other hand allows construction work after de-sealing of premises when case was still under trial
Such types of orders have been encouraging total lawlessness as everyone feels that they can raise any construction without permission and later on same shall be compounded. Moreover stringent view of the shortfall in duties of the Khilaf Warzi officer/Enforcement Inspector of the area concerned should also be taken who were also accountable and kept their eyes shut when construction was being raised without any sanctioned plan
Trending
- JMC first allows unauthorized construction on existing violated ground floor at residential plot 66/5, Ward-50, Channi Himmat then wrongly approves conditional site plan taking undertaking from owner that existing violations shall be removed before start of fresh construction but allows first and 2nd floor commercial halls with unauthorized 3rd floor when owner didn’t remove violations on existing ground floor and instead extended galleries up to 3rd floor without observing setbacks as per UBBL-2021 now serves demolition order dated 8-3-2025 drastically reducing violations hiding actual violations at site
- JMC fails to implement J&K Special Tribunal Status Quo order in vogue since 10-1-2022 at commercial plot in Greater Kailash main road, Lane-10 near HDFC Bank, Ward-68 allows owner not only to complete violated ground, first and 2nd floor all measuring 1185.5 Sqmt each against permitted 559 Sqft each but also unauthorized 3rd floor measuring 208 Sqm without maintaining setbacks completely deviating from approved site plan besides allowing owner to start commercial activities on ground floor under name and style Barista and Blue Moon Unisex Spa and Saloon on 2nd floor from last 8 months when status quo is still intact and next date of hearing is on 24-4-2025 before Tribunal Bench-III
- JMC unmoved towards unauthorized running of children play centre in both first and 2nd floors and a restaurant cum canteen in the third floor of residential plot 649/3 on main road of Channi Himmat Housing Board Colony even when J&K Housing Board endorsed three letters to Commissioner JMC to act against owner for running commercial activities from residential plot by making sheer breach of lease deed and also against JMP-2032 and Unified Building Bye-laws 2021
- Both JMC & JDA passing buck on each other in owning responsibility of ongoing commercial constructions at Fruit Mandi Complex Narwal, Jammu in case of ongoing commercial construction at commercial site-5, Ward-49 wherein JMC has provided 100% coverage to owner without asking her to maintain setbacks and JMC issues permission in these types of schemes as per coverage confirmation given by JDA with respect to lease agreement and JK UBBL-2021 does not implement in these plots whereas JDA itself admits in a RTI reply that JDA has been approving site plans as per UBBL-2021 since its approval from Board of Directors of JDA in the meeting held on 1-12-2021
- JMC makes mockery of demolition drive at bifurcated J&K Housing Board residential corner plot 29-C Shastri Nagar, Ward-22 by visiting site to demolish violated commercial construction with JCB four times but return back to complete formalities of demolition by uprooting few bricks without serving owner relevant notices under JMC Act 2000 as a result of which violated construct still fully intact and in forthcoming govt holidays from March 27th slab work will be completed much to agony of aggrieved locals
- JMC fails to implement J&K Special Tribunal Status Quo order in vogue since 10-1-2022 at commercial plot in Greater Kailash main road, Lane-10 near HDFC Bank, Ward-68 allows owner not only to complete violated ground, first and 2nd floor all in equal size but also unauthorized 3rd floor without maintaining setbacks completely deviating from approved site plan besides allowing owner to start commercial activities on ground floor under name and style Barista and Blue Moon Unisex Spa and Saloon on 2nd floor from last 8 months
- JMC’s eye-wash; After faking demolition, construction work on commercial structure resumes bifurcated residential plot 29-C in Shastri Nagar Jammu
- J&K Excise Department rebuts news on increase in number of Liquor Vends