Author: Golden Yug

Despite First Appellant Authority direction dated 17-10-2024 to Enforcement Officer to provide with whose permission unauthorized 3rd floor constructed at residential house 600/3, Enforcement Officer wrongly replied that partially matter pertains to Building Section and action already initiated to remove tin shed vide letter No. JMC/Enf/290-91 dated 9-11-2024 but Enforcement Officer practically didn’t take any action despite Commissioner JMC directed Enforcement Officer to remove tin shed Owner has also put sign Board of credible classes which reads Root Tuition Centre for strong foundation for classes 10th to 12th on the main wall facing 60 ft main road of Channi Himmat…

JMC fails to implement its 10 days conditional de-sealing order served in favour of Rajinder Sharma owner of private land in front of Kalyan Jewellers ,Sector-3 Channi Himmat as owner hasn’t removed entry gate shutter, nor re-fixed gate,didn’t install three windows on first floor, construct partition walls of residential accommodation when he premises was de-sealed on condition to bring premises as it was earlier JMC nearly after six months of start of conversion of residential accommodation into commercial served owner notice under section 253(1) & 258 (1) of JMC Act 2000 issued by Dy Commissioner South vide No. JMC/DC (S)/Enf/1315-18…

The owner deviating from approved residential site plan raised three commercial halls without maintaining setbacks and didn’t construct proper kitchen, living room, drawing room and porch. Owner initially to hoodwink general public kept window for kitchen on ground floor and main entry from porch area on ground floor and raised stairs quite back of porch to reach first and 2nd floors and didn’t construct duplex house and keeping entry to kitchen from porch area besides constructing extra room on 2nd floor excluding mumty. This violated construction was duly highlighted by print media by publishing first story on 13-11-2024 and 2nd…

Commissioner JMC  served owner notice  vide No. JMC/Enf/12-16 dated 9-12-2023 for converting his residential house into commercial one by letting J&K Bank to run its branch from residential house  and served owner 48 hours ultimatum to owner asking as to why land use change made by owner in conservation of the provisions of JMC Act 2000 and UBBL-2021 may not be demolished/pulled down/sealed  failing which action as warranted under JMC Act 2000 read with UBBL norms 2021 shall be taken  which proved mere eyewash and no follow-up action taken by JMC as a result of which J&K Bank branch Channi…

As per notice under provision of section 253(1) JMC Act 2000 served to owner of residential plot 250-C, Channi Himmat, the owner was given 48 hours ultimatum to reply to this notice and also was directed to stop construction failing which action warranted under  section 253(1) JMC Act 2000 will be taken against him but as of now ,the unauthorized construction is still going on at the site Owner didn’t raise residential construction on ground floor like bedroom, lobby, kitchen,  toilet and also cut out for ventilation and also staircase towards front side was also not constructed but to hoodwink…

In response to demolition order under section 253(1) of JMC Act 2000 dated 02.08.2024, owner wrongly submitted a reply that J&K Special Tribunal directed the owner of the building to deposit the compounding fee in JMC on 10.10.2013 of Rs. 1,27,800/- within a period of two months which was deposited by the owner with a Cheque No. 122994.Whereas, the file was sent to Account section to verify whether the owner has deposited the compounding fees or not, whereas, the Account section verified and reported that as per record no cheque/payment has been received till date. Owner also raised the construction…

JMC did not take requisite action against construction of three unauthorized shops despite Dy General Manager through a letter informed Joint Commissioner JMC that three year validity of approved site plan granted by JMC dated 26-11-2018 had already lapsed as the owner started construction of unauthorized three shops after nearly six years of getting site plan dated 26-11-2018 demanding action against owner as per Uniform Policy of J&K Housing Board. Now at present violated commercial construction is going on and the main walls towards front side have been raised to a considerable height which is evident from the pictures published…

Owner was also asked to submit written undertaking on affidavit dated 27-11-2024 that he would demolish the violated portion of existing basement, ground floor before start of fresh construction and also put partition walls on existing ground floor and the violated portion including violations towards left side and backside to be demolished by owner was categorically marked in green colour but surprisingly the drawing in proposed site plan was missing as there was no mention of drawing room, stairs and lift when infact there were two shops towards backside. Anyway the owner didn’t demolish existing violations on basement and ground…

As per Section 5.2.1.2 under Table 5.4 under Unified Building Bye-laws 2021, in case of commercial construction up to 100 sqm ,the ground coverage is allowed only 70%, FAR 210 and construction so allowed is ground plus one floor and neither basement nor stilt floor parking is allowed up to 100 sqm. It is surprising to note that area in case of three differently approved site plans is well below 100 sqm then how the owners were allowed new stilt floor commercial for parking measuring 12.1 sqm, 12.8 sqm and 12.1 sqm respectively towards front side which means site plans…

Owner didn’t raise residential construction on ground floor like bedroom, lobby, kitchen, toilet and also cut out for ventilation and also staircase towards front side was also not constructed but to hoodwink general public and JMC Authorities kept 2 ft size two windows and small size door 2 ft in size in middle of these two windows to show construction being residential as walls adjoin with it was deliberately constructed as temporary walls with a intention to remove them easily and also didn’t leave area as mandatory in setbacks like the owner left front 9 ft when he was duty…