- Commercial construction reaches third floor on residential plot 250-C, Sector-2 Channi Himmat Zonal planned colony without maintaining setbacks completely contrary to residential approved site plan with no provision of windows, ventilators, cut out and JMC now serves owner notice under provision of section 253(1) JMC Act 2000 without mentioning actual violations like three floors commercial, extended galleries, iron stairs from backside and no internal walls partitions
- JMC stuns Channi Himmat by sealing Varmani Shopping Complex, Channi Himmat, Sector-2, Ward-50 on 30-12-2024 for violations to tune of 8053 sqft in basement+ground+3 floor excluding violated 4th floor of 2674 sqft correcting earlier violations of 1704 sqft and de-sealing Complex on 31-12-2024 for 20 days besides allowing its functioning since 2013 without depositing compounding fee Rs 127800 by owner as decided by J&K Special Tribunal dated 30-12-2013
- JMC enforcement staff after shaking hands with owner allows restart of three unauthorized big size commercial shops at residential plot 29-C, Shastri Nagar, Ward-22 which remained stopped for sometime after aggrieved locals opposed commercial construction and print media highlighted violated construction along with pictures dated 21-10-2024 making land use change without getting site plan approved from JMC which can’t be done plot being bifurcated
- JMC yet again makes mockery of notice under section 253 (1) JMC Act 2000 served to owner of residential plot 66/5 ,Ward-50 Channi Himmat wherein serves 48 hours ultimatum to owner to remove violations dated 14-10-2024 but without taking follow-up action against owner approves fresh site plan dated 28-11-2024 when existing violations were not removed by owner after giving written undertaking and further construction of two floors started
- JMC Building Section out of way sanctions stilt floor commercial parking stage-1st at commercial sites 3,4 and 5 in Sector-2 Ward-50 Channi Himmat and enforcement staff fails to take action against owners when differently approved site plans clubbed and raised joint construction of commercial halls as single unit without maintaining setbacks and not constructing new stilt floors commercial and in spite of violations in stage-1st construction JMC approved stage 2nd construction and at present stage-2nd construction going on from last 15 days with help of enforcement staff
- Commercial construction reaches third floor on residential plot 250-C, Sector-2 Channi Himmat Zonal planned colony without maintaining setbacks completely contrary to residential approved site plan with no provision of windows, ventilators, cut out but JMC yet to take action against owner despite highlighting violated construction in Print Media along with pictures and bringing same in notice of concerned enforcement staff deployed in Channi Himmat Zonal planned colony
- JMC Enforcement staff deputed in Channi Himmat Ward-50 allowing construction of commercial hall on residential plot 634/3 without maintaining setbacks, without partition of walls, windows, ventilators with stairs on front side and also with lift provision absolutely contrary to residential approved site plan doing huge injustice with those who have purchased commercial sites
- Existing violated structure on private land falling under Khasra No. 4 Min, Ward-51, Channi Himmat earlier sealed, site plan withdrawn, then restored without removing violations now undergoing complete renovation and conversion from sanctioned mixed use of both residential and commercial to full-fledged commercial halls on three floors measuring 10000 sqft each to run big size shopping mall without JMC permission but with help of enforcement staff deployed in Channi Himmat
Author: Golden Yug
These three differently approved site plans basically belongs to one family as in two approved site plans one name is common that is Sahil Gupta and third plot also a part of same family and deliberately clubbed three plans to acquire more area after taking into confidence the favour of enforcement staff who have already shut their eyes over this violated construction of three shops Raj Kumar Gupta a habitual offender and master of raising violated construction with active connivance of enforcement staff was served BOCA notice under provision of section 7(3) vide No.MJ/CEO/206/3/2011 dated 24-9-2011 for raising commercial construction…
Owner purposefully didn’t get site plan approved from JMC as had the owner got approved site plan from JMC, he would have been permitted only 70% construction on plot area and 30% was mandatory to be left for parking purpose but the owner at the site raising construction of shop by covering 100% plot area and the work is going on continuously Enforcement Inspector Gagan Kumar has the habit of disregarding complaints by social and RTI Activists who are serving whistle blowers so that JMP-2032 can be implemented in letter and spirit. It is high time to hold Gagan Kumar…
It is shocking to note that after status Quo dated 4-5-2021 obtained from J&K Special Tribunal by owner, JMC maintained status Quo of shutting their eyes and ears but the owner during status quo period successfully raised three more violated floors on ground floor wherein status quo was enforce covering nearly 12000 sqft each besides walls raised on 4th floor and a room with active support of enforcement staff deputed in the area. When illegal construction was going on smoothly, whistle blowers along with aggrieved people strongly objected to continue construction when Status Quo was in placed, JMC as a…
The owner purposefully didn’t get site plan approved from JMC as had the owner applied for approval of site plan , he would have got only 70% construction and was duty bound to leave 30% for parking and moreover he couldn’t have got permission to construct basement which was constructed by owner by covering hundred percent area under construction and raising further three floors When slab work being done on 2nd floor, the photographs of same along with relevant details were sent on whatsapp numbers of enforcement staff on 2-5-2024 seeking immediate action and to stop slab work on first…
The ongoing construction of tin shed was duly brought into kind notice of Enforcement Inspector deputed in area Gagan Kumar by aggrieved locals but instead of taking action against owner, he lied that the work is stopped but the shed work is going on as on date. This is now a well established modus operandi that initially raise tin shed get the walls white washed simultaneously and later using modern techniques available in market turn it into impressive first floor and the same will be done in the present case also Despite well defined powers designated to enforcement staff, they…
Surprisingly JMC approved site plan measuring area 6 Kanal 7 Marlas (3071.10) sqmtr whereas the owners sought land use permission from JDA for area 5 Kanals and 13 Marlas. This is shocking to note that why more land was shown while approving site plan and why land use permission was sought for 5 Kanals and 13 Marlas which prima-facie suggests allowing more area against permitted construction According to stage-2nd approved site plan ,the owners were allowed new basement-1 commercial as 1808.79 Sqm (19470) Sqft whereas in stage-1st approved site plan new basement-1 commercial was 1780.48 Sqm (19164) Sqft was for…
Owner Vishav Deepak Suri against approved site plan vide No. 1430/JMC/BS/2021 dated 22-2-2022 approved in the name of previous owner Chander Bhushan who didn’t start construction and infect sold it out to Suri as vacant plot. Didn’t raise ground floor 960 Sqft as allowed going much beyond 1250 Sqft and also didn’t observe setbacks including front 12 ft and 6 inch, rear 7 ft 9 inch and infect raised commercial construction on a residential plot as there are no windows, ventilators and partition walls and infect full-fledged one commercial hall with lift provision and in no way it is residential…
JMC was seriously wrong in asking owner to bring land use change permission from JDA (CLU) under section11A(2) of J&K Development Act 1970 vide SO 439 dated 24th December 2021 (HUDD) to run Jeweller Showroom Tanishq which was not at all applicable in the present case as in the present case there was already violated structure covering four floors and there was no fun asking for land use permission on built up structure which is applicable for vacant land Commissioner JMC despite knowing very well that the certificate of change of land use from JDA shall govern only the usage…
The owner purposefully didn’t get site plan approved from JMC as had the owner applied for approval of site plan , he would have got only 70% construction and was duty bound to leave 30% for parking and moreover he couldn’t have got permission to construct basement which was constructed by owner by covering hundred percent area under construction and raising further three floors When slab work being done on 2nd floor, the photographs of same along with relevant details were sent on whatsapp numbers of Commissioner JMC, Enforcement Officer Anil Kashyap and enforcement Inspector Shiv Kumar on 2-5-2024 seeking…
Owner applied for change in business vide Application No. JK-COR-NOC/2023/00190 dated 20-7-2023 but the permission file remained linger on for one year and meanwhile the owner was granted sufficient time to make necessary changes to run Jeweller Showroom Tanishq and significantly changed inter dimensions without JMC permission JMC took no action against owner when he was raising violated construction and under extreme public pressure served owner BOCA demolition notice under provision of section 7(3) vide No.MJ/CEO/240/3/2011 dated 1-3-2012 when the structure was nearing completion setting ground for compounding of violations which was later done by Tribunal when owner approach it…