- JMC enforcement staff after shaking hands with owner allows restart of three unauthorized big size commercial shops at residential plot 29-C, Shastri Nagar, Ward-22 on 19-2-2025 which remained stopped for sometime after aggrieved locals opposed commercial construction and print media highlighted violated construction along with pictures making land use change without getting site plan approved from JMC which can’t be done plot being bifurcated
- Residents of Channi Himmat strongly resent Commissioner JMC seeking NOC from J&K Housing Board to establish Rehri Zone at existing Parking site of Channi Himmat main Shamshan Ghat constructed at estimated cost of Rs 78 lacs over Thangar Nallah drain urging both JMC and Housing Board to drop idea in larger interests of Channi Himmat residents and those attend cremations
- JMC finally serves sealing order under JMC Act 2000 to owner of private land falling under Khasra No. 477 Min in Sector-3, Ward-51,old village Channi Himmat when four floors violated structure making 66.37% violations on each floor already completed and husband of owner Dr Rajeev started running Day Care Medical Centre by covering 750 Sqft against owned 644 Sqft without maintaining setbacks and public parking within premises against JMP-2032 and Unified Building Bye-laws 2021
- Forest fire rages on at shrine board from last one month, no accountability
- JMC’s sealing & de-sealing orders to owner of residential plot 274/3,Ward-50, Channi Himmat proved counter-productive for owner as full-fledged commercial hall after removing partition walls of existing ground floor still intact despite undertaking submitted by owner to construct brick walls partition but constructing plywood partitions to hoodwink JMC authorities
- JMC serves owner eyewash de-sealing order without mentioning actual violations to owner of residential plot 328/4 , Ward-50 Channi Himmat for raising violated full-fledged commercial ground floor plus three floors against permitted ground plus two floors without maintaining setbacks, height against JMP-2032 and Unified Building Bye-laws 2021 when construction going on from last ten months and now reaches finishing level
- JMC approves commercial site plan allowing owner to cover 100% plot area in construction of commercial basement for storage & utility and commercial ground floor without mentioning their height not mandating to maintain setbacks at JDA’s commercial site No.5 Phase-II commercial complex Fruit Market, Narwal Fruit Mandi Jammu, Ward-49 adjoining with Head Branch of J&K Grameen Bank against JMP-2032/Unified Building Bye-laws 2021
- JMC unmoved towards unauthorized running of children play centre in both first and 2nd floors and a restaurant cum canteen in the third floor of residential plot 649/3 on main road of Channi Himmat Housing Board Colony even when J&K Housing Board endorsed three letters to Commissioner JMC to act against owner for running commercial activities from residential plot by making sheer breach of lease deed and also against JMP-2032 and Unified Building Bye-laws 2021
Author: Golden Yug
Owner as per registry of land in Court of law owned only 1000 Sqft but owner raised construction covering nearly 1359.8 Sqft and the extra land he occupied was part of irrigation land road which was not taken care of by Enforcement staff while visiting site and also locals bringing in their notice that owner has covered road area what to think of observing mandatory setbacks which speaks volumes the sincerity of enforcement staff with which it works in the field. As per demolition order dated 18-5-2024, owner was directed to demolish /pull down violated construction within seven days from…
JMC remained unmoved even when excessive digging was strongly resented by locals as the owner covered hundred percent area and even covered nearby flowing waste water Nallah by putting slab on Nallah to facilitate two way entry both from front side and back side being a corner plot having approaching road both towards front and back side After publishing story , the construction work remained stopped for few days, but owner taking into confidence enforcement staff on 8-6-2024 started removing rough concrete which was earlier filled under strong public pressure sensing that now things are settled and that now nobody…
These three differently approved site plans basically belongs to one family as in two approved site plans one name is common that is Sahil Gupta and third plot also a part of same family and deliberately clubbed three plans to acquire more area after taking into confidence the favour of enforcement staff who have already shut their eyes over this violated construction of three shops Raj Kumar Gupta a habitual offender and master of raising violated construction with active connivance of enforcement staff was served BOCA notice under provision of section 7(3) vide No.MJ/CEO/206/3/2011 dated 24-9-2011 for raising commercial construction…
Owner purposefully didn’t get site plan approved from JMC as had the owner got approved site plan from JMC, he would have been permitted only 70% construction on plot area and 30% was mandatory to be left for parking purpose but the owner at the site raising construction of shop by covering 100% plot area and the work is going on continuously Enforcement Inspector Gagan Kumar has the habit of disregarding complaints by social and RTI Activists who are serving whistle blowers so that JMP-2032 can be implemented in letter and spirit. It is high time to hold Gagan Kumar…
It is shocking to note that after status Quo dated 4-5-2021 obtained from J&K Special Tribunal by owner, JMC maintained status Quo of shutting their eyes and ears but the owner during status quo period successfully raised three more violated floors on ground floor wherein status quo was enforce covering nearly 12000 sqft each besides walls raised on 4th floor and a room with active support of enforcement staff deputed in the area. When illegal construction was going on smoothly, whistle blowers along with aggrieved people strongly objected to continue construction when Status Quo was in placed, JMC as a…
The owner purposefully didn’t get site plan approved from JMC as had the owner applied for approval of site plan , he would have got only 70% construction and was duty bound to leave 30% for parking and moreover he couldn’t have got permission to construct basement which was constructed by owner by covering hundred percent area under construction and raising further three floors When slab work being done on 2nd floor, the photographs of same along with relevant details were sent on whatsapp numbers of enforcement staff on 2-5-2024 seeking immediate action and to stop slab work on first…
The ongoing construction of tin shed was duly brought into kind notice of Enforcement Inspector deputed in area Gagan Kumar by aggrieved locals but instead of taking action against owner, he lied that the work is stopped but the shed work is going on as on date. This is now a well established modus operandi that initially raise tin shed get the walls white washed simultaneously and later using modern techniques available in market turn it into impressive first floor and the same will be done in the present case also Despite well defined powers designated to enforcement staff, they…
Surprisingly JMC approved site plan measuring area 6 Kanal 7 Marlas (3071.10) sqmtr whereas the owners sought land use permission from JDA for area 5 Kanals and 13 Marlas. This is shocking to note that why more land was shown while approving site plan and why land use permission was sought for 5 Kanals and 13 Marlas which prima-facie suggests allowing more area against permitted construction According to stage-2nd approved site plan ,the owners were allowed new basement-1 commercial as 1808.79 Sqm (19470) Sqft whereas in stage-1st approved site plan new basement-1 commercial was 1780.48 Sqm (19164) Sqft was for…
Owner Vishav Deepak Suri against approved site plan vide No. 1430/JMC/BS/2021 dated 22-2-2022 approved in the name of previous owner Chander Bhushan who didn’t start construction and infect sold it out to Suri as vacant plot. Didn’t raise ground floor 960 Sqft as allowed going much beyond 1250 Sqft and also didn’t observe setbacks including front 12 ft and 6 inch, rear 7 ft 9 inch and infect raised commercial construction on a residential plot as there are no windows, ventilators and partition walls and infect full-fledged one commercial hall with lift provision and in no way it is residential…
JMC was seriously wrong in asking owner to bring land use change permission from JDA (CLU) under section11A(2) of J&K Development Act 1970 vide SO 439 dated 24th December 2021 (HUDD) to run Jeweller Showroom Tanishq which was not at all applicable in the present case as in the present case there was already violated structure covering four floors and there was no fun asking for land use permission on built up structure which is applicable for vacant land Commissioner JMC despite knowing very well that the certificate of change of land use from JDA shall govern only the usage…